"Geez, Jesse. You're really digging into the bottom of the barrel here, aren't you?"
And you'd be right. But J. Grant Swank, a religion writer for the Magic City Morning Star in Millinocket, Maine, caught my eye while I was researching the one and only Antonin Scalia for a future entry in the List. I had never heard of him and I doubt that anyone within 5 miles of Millinocket, Maine has ever heard of him, either.
And when the title of his most recent story is "Religious Issues: Clone Scalia Nationwide", you don't really need to to dig much deeper to realize that Mr. Swank is a Conservative Republican. A Bush Voter. A Moral King who lives by The Book. A humble servant of God.
He should have just named his story: "What I Learned at the Kool-Aid Punch Social: Antonin Scalia is Jesus Re-Incarnate. And It's About Fucking Time. Line Up to be Judged!"
Who knows... Maybe this post will be his break into the "big time" and he'll get a deal with Fox News. However, I doubt he'd want to be known for being lambasted on Republican Sinners. But that's neither here nor there.
"What the fuck are you talking about?" I hear you say. "Get on with it!"
Very well.
It is often stated that the perpetrators of 9/11 had hijacked the Islamic religion and molded the words of the Quran to fit their desires. And, you know what, I would have to agree with that assessment. I think a lot of people would agree with that.
I'm no scholar of the Quran but I can bet that there aren't too many parts about killing mass numbers of people to do away with that Evil "Freedom" thing (for our Conservative readers). And I doubt that there's a passage in there that encourages followers to pay attention to the foreign policies of the United States Government and use that as a rationale for killing thousands of innocent Americans (for our Liberal readers).
And the people that misinterpret the Quran are regarded as full of Pride and full of Evil, right?
They're full of Pride for disregarding the true meaning of the Text, mocking people who find a different, maybe more peaceful, meaning in the Text, and turning that misguided view into the Law of the Land, even though some people might disagree with it (and therefore suffer the consequences of being different). They're full of Evil for using the Text as a reason to denigrate certain people.
So we all agree on these points up to now (I'm assuming).
So what would you call it when J. Grant Swank says something like this:
That reminds me of liberal theologians. They do the same with the Bible. They make it out to say whatever they want it to say. That's what the United Church of Christ (Congregational) denomination is doing today with their cute slogan saying believers should not put a period where God puts a comma. They've got signs purporting that, such unbiblical dogma plastered on church lawns throughout the country. What does that mean don't put a period where deity has placed a comma? It means exactly what the UCC liberals want it to mean. Specifically, they are referring to the practicing homosexual lifestyle. They conclude that the Bible has a comma on that matter. In other words, God continues his revelation into present-tense with other than what He revealed in the Holy Scripture. Therefore, today's liberal theologians have the mind of the Holy Spirit when they endorse practicing homosexuality as heaven blessed.
If that's not a crock I don't know what is. In other words, God doesn't know what He's thinking and what He's saying when He gives His believing community the Scriptures. So He can contradict Himself for today He approves of the same gender having sex while in the past it was an abomination.
So that's what the liberal theologians are doing in the UCC, Episcopal Church and Evangelical Lutheran Church of America and wherever else they can find heretical wiggle room in their mainline denominations. Of course, such rewriting of the Bible does not square with God and such apostate religious leaders will answer severely at the Judgment Seat of Christ. God in fact has placed a period in His revelation when it comes to practicing homosexual lifestyles. There is absolutely no comma there anywhere, ever, nowhere.
So just as the liberal church leaders are committing sacrilege, so Scalia claims the opportunistic judges are committing unpatriotic acts of injustice by twisting the plain text of the Constitution to serve their own liberal, un-American politically correct ends.
He then goes on to quote passages of the Bible that support his view on homosexuality.
So, in what manner is he using the Bible here?
It's two-fold. One, to say that homosexuality is a sin and that churches that accept the homosexual lifestyle are Satanic. Two, to express his belief that Christianity should guide lawmakers here in America: The Land of Immigrants. He also uses undertones to say that Liberals are the same as terrorists.
I'm not going to get into the specifics of what the Bible says on homosexuality but, rather, look at how he weaves the Constitution into a discussion on Christianity.
Now, where in the Bible does it state that Governments should use the Bible as a guidepost for laws? Where in the Bible does it state that people who are different shouldn't be loved?
I believe the only people the Bible are talking about are people who profess to be Christian. It doesn't talk about world domination and running Governments based on the Bible. It talks about people in Government using Christianity in their own lives.
Ask the majority of Christian's what Jesus was about and they'll say one thing: Love.
And the Constitution? It's a legal document. And even Mr. Swank's hero, Antonin Scalia, notes:
"The Constitution says what it says and does not say what it does not say."
Does the Constitution say anything about gay people? Anything about the Bible? Anything about Jesus? Anything about Love?
No. It doesn't, my friends. It talks about inalienable rights bestowed upon people so that everyone can be a part of America, no matter what religion the writers happened to be.
Sadly, Mr. Swank is guilty of the same Sin he is accusing "Liberal" theologians of. Molding what the Bible says to fit his own vision. A vision where the Constitution is replaced by the Bible and outsiders are shunned and pushed away.
That doesn't sound like Christian Love to me. It sounds like a God Complex.
And Mr. Swank is too Proud and so confident of himself to realize it.
J. Grant Swank is still writing scores of columns for the Magic City Morning Star.
Jeremiah 49:16
The terror you inspire and the pride of your heart have deceived you,
you who live in the clefts of the rocks, who occupy the heights of the hill.
Though you build your nest as high as the eagle's, from there I will bring you down," declares the LORD .